倫倫的小blog

這邊是提供OG的範例，希望你先做一次後，然後跟example對比看看。

no.6 會先聽一段lecture，最後你要整合，

那我們就開始吧

lecture:
 

Question:

Using points and examples from the talk, explain the two definition of money presented by the professor.

response 6-1 (high-level)

The professor says that money.. money is a medium of exchange. But anything that you can purchase something with is considered to be money that's one denifition. That means when youuu.. She uses an example of taxi driver who accepts money for his ride, but if he drives the fruit-telling(?? fruit-selling) person he can also, instead of money, accept fruit hmm.. for.. for his drive.. for the drive he get the fruit person.

So in that case, the fruit is the medium of exchange and.. not the money.

So under the first difinition hmm.. not only dollar bills and coins are money but also.. also..other mediums of exchange like fruit in this case for the taxi driver.

hmm..second difinition she thought it's a legal definition.

The legal de.. the legal definition just coins, dollar bills are legal.. legal hmm.. money and that's.. in this  definition.

High level

The speaker's pronunication and intonation are highly intelligible. She speaks a liitle too quickly at times, but the overall meaning is not lost. Her words and ideas flow easily from one idea to the next. She use complex grammatical structures and a wide range of vocabulary. The speaker fluently summarizes the stimulus accurately recounting the broad and narrow definition. Her response is detailed and sustained. She spends too much time summarizing the first definition and example, so she does not fully expalin the second definition and example. However, it is obvious from the apparent ease in which she speaks that she understands the concept and is able to talk about it.

rater重點：

1. 她的發音與音調非常的清晰。 但說話有時過快，但不影響她表達想法。

2. 她的用字與想法能很流暢的表達出來

3. 正確的複述了廣義與狹義的定義

4. 她的回答很仔細

5. 花太多時間在第一個定義上，而沒有時間能講第二的定義，

   不過評審認為，從她之前的內容中，

   可以推論她是瞭解第二的定義的

no.6 是 no.4的精簡版；只有lecture的部份，

所需要作的工作與no.4類似，只是現在不用講lecture與reading的關係了

(1) 講出lecture的main idea

(2) 說出他的detail

同時，也跟no. 1~2 一樣，

注重 流暢度、內容發展完整、有邏輯

來看分析：

(1) 講出lecture的main idea

這位回答者說到「The money is a medium of exchange」

第一個定義「anything you can use as a mean to buy something」

第二的定義「legal definition: coins, dollar bills」

她很完整的講出的lecture的main idea

(2) 說出他的detail

她有說到「司機與水果商交換服務與水果」的例子

只可惜，她花太時間在講第一個定義了，第二個定義的細節就沒提到。

response 6-2 (mid-level)

One of the definition of money presented by the professor is.. eeh.. money is that.. is anything can exchange with the purday.. purchase.

For example, hmm.. including.. the money, the.. coin, bill and..the food, vegetable like this. We can hmm.. exchange hmm.. with something to buy..... them.. buyyy pur..purchase.

So first thing.. first definition is.. just can anything can exchange to its pur..purchase.

To one other.. anotherrr definition of money presented by the professor ... is whatever .. hmm excepting(??accepting).. a legal excepting(accepting) the............

whatever for example

mid-level

The speaker's pronunciation is generally clear. She sustains speech and continues to try to elaborate her ideas. The hesitance and choppiness indicates a lack of control of vocabulary and grammar. This significantly affects the overally intelligibility of the response. She conveys some relevant details including an  almost acuurate summary of both definition of money. However, her response is clearly incomplete. The speaker's struggle to find the right words to convey her ideas prevents her from efficiently using her time. Netiher of the examples is included in the response. Most of her ideas are underdeveloped.

rater重點：

1. 她的發音，一般來說，是還清晰的

2. 她持續的一分鐘的時間，試著講明她的想法

3. 「猶豫」與「突然轉換」 表現出她不能良好控制文法與字彙

    她掙扎地想找出合適的用字，使她不能有效地控制她的時間

4. 她提出了一些重要的細節，包括了兩個對錢的定義，

   但是定義與例子都缺乏完整性，

   大部分的想法都是未發展良好的

來看分析：

(1) 講出lecture的main idea

第一個定義「anything can exchange with the purchase」

第二的定義「legal accepting」

第一個定義的解釋還不錯，但第二的定義卻因為時間用完了，

沒辦法解釋

(2) 說出他的detail

在解釋第一個定義時，

她有說水果、食物、硬幣、紙鈔都可以視為錢，

但沒提到計程車司機的例子。

第二個定義，沒有提到detail了